What is the difference between Amazon S3 and Amazon EBS?

One of the major differences between Amazon S3 or Simple Storage Service and Amazon EBS or Elastic Block Store is that EBS can only be used for Elastic Computing Cloud instances, whereas S3 also allows all the files in its buckets to be retrieved, provided you would be using HTTP protocols. Since S3 can be easily accessed using HTTP Protocols, this file storage service is usually used by web browsers to store some of their files. Before EBS can be used, it must be on the EC2 instance.

With this, you will be able to write and read information with EBS. In contrast, before you can use S3 to store or retrieve data, you will need some kind of software. In terms of capacity, the maximum number of volumes in EBS is 20, whereas S3 has up to 100 buckets. This means S3 has a higher storage capacity compared to EBS. Another advantage of S3 over EBS is that it can be used by multiple instances, whereas EBS only supports one instance at a time.

S3 stands for Simple Storage Service, while EBS stands for Elastic Block Store. These are two file storage services provided by Amazon. The critical difference between the two is how they can be used. EBS is meant explicitly for EC2, which stands for Elastic Computing Cloud, and S3 is not limited to EC2. The files are an S3 cannot be restored using HTTP protocols or even BitTorrent.

Many sites use S3 to store most of their files because it is convenient to access HTTP clients. With EBS, a volume can be set on an EC2 instance, and it would look like a hard disk partition. S3 is superior with storage. It may be formatted with any file system, and files can be written or read by the EC2 precisely as it would be in the hard drive. EBS has a standard limit of twenty volumes, with each volume holding a certain amount of data. A significant disadvantage of EBS is its inability to be used multiple times at once. However, S3 can hold multiple images simultaneously.