What is the difference between Hunter and Jumper Horse?

The differences between hunter and jumper horse are not that easy to identify or else you are familiar with the phase of the game and the anatomy of the horse. A major difference between the hunter horse and jumper horse is in the rule of the game. The hunter horses are subjectively judged, while the jumper horses are objectively judged. In hunter horse’s competitions, a bit of decency needs to be maintained. Points are given by the judges according to movement, style, temperament, confrontation, suitability, and quality.

In this competition, the judgment is subjective because the judges give scores base on their opinions. In jumper horse competition, judgments are not based on temperament, movements, or styles, but based on rails down, falls, run-outs, and faults. As much as gaits or styles are not that important in completions involving jumper horse, the hunter horse game demands that the horse and the rider accomplish perfect movements, gait, and styles.

One of the primary differences between a Hunter Horse and a Jumper Horse is in the way that the games are judged. The Hunter horses are judged subjectively, and Jumper horses are judged objectively; however, Hunter horses have to be careful to maintain their integrity. The judges give them points for style, movement, quality, temperament, suitability, and confrontation.

In competitions involving jumper horses, judgment is not based upon the same criteria. It is based upon faults, rails, down, run-outs, and falls. Judging jumper horses is objective, and speed determines the outcome. Different judges cannot possess different opinions concerning the speed and the faults concerning the jumper horses. The winning jumper horse completes the jumping course in the shortest amount of time.